About IAC
A-Z Index
Immunization Action Coalition
IAC Home
Ask the Experts
Question of the Week

Ask the Experts

Question of the Week

March 2015 Back to top
MARCH 24, 2015
I need information about the administration of vaccines to 3-month-old conjoined twins (joined at the buttocks). The mother states that a hepatitis B vaccine was given at birth but there is no record of this. For their routine immunization, do we provide one set of vaccinations or two, given that they are conjoined at the buttock but share no major organs?
ACIP does not address this issue. However, CDC recommends that these children should each be vaccinated, notwithstanding they are conjoined. We believe even in conjoined twins who share organs and/or blood supply, vaccination of each child would also be indicated. The rationale is one cannot be sure, even in the latter case, that the common organs/blood supply would eliminate vaccine antigens less quickly, or the immune system(s) would respond adequately, to one dose of each vaccine for the two children. Therefore two doses seems appropriate, that is, one dose of each vaccine for each child.
MARCH 17, 2015
Can varicella vaccine be used as postexposure prophylaxis for a 9-month-old who was exposed to herpes zoster?
Varicella vaccine is neither approved nor recommended for children younger than age 12 months. Assuming that the child is not immunocompromised, varicella zoster immune globulin (VariZIG, Emergent BioSolutions Inc.) is also not recommended. If the child had a condition which was considered to place the child at greater risk for complications than the general population, then VariZIG could be considered (see www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm6228.pdf, page 574).
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) does not have a recommendation for acyclovir as varicella postexposure prophylaxis, although the American Academy of Pediatrics does provide some guidance on this issue in the 2012 edition of the Red Book.
MARCH 10, 2015
We have a 63-year-old patient who states she had tetanus as a child. She does not know whether she ever had any tetanus-containing vaccines in her lifetime. Should Tdap be given to this patient, and is it safe?
A history of tetanus disease is not a reason to avoid tetanus-containing vaccines. Tetanus disease does not produce immunity because of the very small amount of toxin required to produce illness. As long as your patient has no other contraindications she should receive Tdap now. If she has no documentation of prior tetanus vaccination, she should receive a complete 3-dose primary series (dose #1 of Tdap, followed by dose #2 of Td 4 to 8 weeks later, and dose #3 of Td 6–12 months after dose #2).
MARCH 3, 2015
A patient born in 1970 has a history of measles disease and is also immunosuppressed due to multiple myeloma. The patient wants to travel to California, but is concerned about the measles outbreak. Should the patient receive the MMR vaccine?
A history of having had measles is not sufficient evidence of measles immunity. A positive serologic test for measles-specific IgG will confirm that the person is immune and is not at risk of infection regardless of the multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma is a hematologic cancer and is considered immunosuppressive so MMR vaccine is contraindicated in this person.
February 2015 Back to top
FEBRUARY 24, 2015
We received a call from a healthcare provider who inadvertently administered MMR vaccine to a woman who was 2 months pregnant. Please advise as to appropriate action steps. 
No specific action needs to be taken other than to reassure the woman that no adverse outcomes are expected as a result of this vaccination. MMR vaccination during pregnancy alone is not a reason to terminate the pregnancy. You should consult with the provider to determine if there is a way to avoid such vaccination errors in the future. Detailed information about MMR vaccination in pregnancy is included in the most recent MMR ACIP statement, available at www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6204.pdf.
FEBRUARY 17, 2015
How does being born before 1957 confer immunity to measles?
People born before 1957 lived through several years of epidemic measles before the first measles vaccine was licensed in 1963. As a result, these people are very likely to have had measles disease. Surveys suggest that 95% to 98% of those born before 1957 are immune to measles (see www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/measles/faqs-dis-vac-risks.htm). Persons born before 1957 can be presumed to be immune. However, if serologic testing indicates that the person is not immune, at least 1 dose of MMR should be administered. Additional information is available at www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6204.pdf.
FEBRUARY 10, 2015
The Catch-Up Immunization Scheduler on the CDC Vaccines and Immunization website is not working. Can you please fix it? We use it to make schedules for Head Start children who are behind schedule.
The child immunization scheduler tool is no longer available. Please use your state or local immunization information system (IIS) for this service. If you are not familiar with your state or local IIS, you can find your state or local immunization program online where you can access your IIS or contact the program for assistance.
FEBRUARY 3, 2015
Our patient is a 78-year-old female who received PCV13 (Prevnar13, Pfizer), then received PPSV23 (Pneumovax 23, Merck) approximately 10 weeks later. She had not received PPSV23 previously. Is the PPSV23 dose valid, or does it need to be repeated?
Answer: Even though the interval was shorter than the recommended 6–12 months, the dose of PPSV23 should be counted and does not need to be repeated. In the future, please note the ACIP recommendations for pneumococcal vaccine-naive patients age 65 and older are as follows: The dose of PPSV23 should be given 6–12 months after a dose of PCV13. If PPSV23 cannot be given during this time window, the dose of PPSV23 should be given during the next visit. The two vaccines should not be coadministered, and the minimum acceptable interval between PCV13 and PPSV23 is 8 weeks. For more information, see ACIP recommendations: Use of 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine and 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years.
January 2015 Back to top
JANUARY 27, 2015
A pediatric surgeon's 12-month-old child received the varicella vaccine and two days later developed a varicella-like rash. The surgeon had chickenpox as a child and had a positive varicella titer several years ago. Is it okay for the surgeon to continue to see patients? Also, is the varicella virus in the rash that develops following vaccination as virulent as the wild-type virus?
Because the surgeon is immune, the child's rash is not a problem and there is no need for the surgeon to restrict activity. In comparing a vaccine rash to wild-type chickenpox infection, transmission is less likely with a vaccine rash and, in general, there are fewer skin lesions.
JANUARY 20, 2015
If Kinrix (DTaP-IPV, GlaxoSmithKline) is inadvertently given to a child age 15 through 18 months, as the fourth DTaP dose and the third IPV dose, do the DTaP and IPV doses need to be repeated?
Since Kinrix is licensed and recommended only for children ages 4 through 6 years, you should take measures to prevent this error in the future. However, you can count this as a valid dose for DTaP and IPV as long as you met the minimum interval between administering dose #3 and dose #4 of DTaP (6 months) and dose #2 and dose #3 of IPV (4 weeks).
JANUARY 13, 2015
My patient is a 66-year-old male with a condition that requires treatment with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) once a month. Can he receive zoster vaccine
Yes. The concern about interference by circulating antibody (from the IVIG), which we have for varicella vaccine, does not apply to zoster vaccine. The amount of antigen in zoster vaccine is high enough to offset any effect of circulating antibody. Also, studies of zoster vaccine were performed on patients receiving antibody-containing blood products with no appreciable effect on efficacy.
JANUARY 6, 2015
Do any of the bacterial vaccines that are recommended for people with functional or anatomic asplenia need to be given before splenectomy? Do the doses count if they are given during the 2 weeks prior to surgery?
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib), and meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) should be given 14 days before splenectomy, if possible. Doses given during the 2 weeks (14 days) before surgery can be counted as valid. If the doses cannot be given prior to the splenectomy, they should be given as soon as the patientís condition has stabilized after surgery. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) should be administered 8 weeks after the dose of PCV13 for people 2 years of age and older.
>> More Questions of the Week: 2014 Archive
Ask the Experts
Ask Experts Home Ask the Experts Home
What's New
Question of the Week
- 2014 Archive
Vaccine Index
Topic Index
Love the Question of the Week?
Receive it every week in your inbox
Each week, IAC Express will highlight a new, topical, or important-to-reiterate Q&A. IAC works with CDC to select the "Question of the Week" based on commonly asked questions.
Please forward the "Question of the Week" to your colleagues and ask them to subscribe to IAC Express.
>> Subscribe to IAC Express!
Submit a Question to Ask the Experts
You can email your question about vaccines or immunization to IAC. As we receive hundreds of emails each month, we cannot guarantee that we will print your specific question in the Ask the Experts feature. However, you will get an answer. You can also email CDC's immunization experts directly at nipinfo@cdc.gov. There is no charge for this service.
email a question
Immunization Action Coalition  •  2550 University Avenue West  •  Suite 415 North  •  Saint Paul, Minnesota  •  55114
tel 651-647-9009  •  fax 651-647-9131
This website is supported in part by a cooperative agreement from the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (Grant No. 5U38IP000290) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, GA. The website content is the sole responsibility of IAC and does not necessarily represent the official views of CDC.